Skip to content
ASIRI

Clinic · SMS · 09:14

Your test results are ready. Please log in to view them.

Solutions · Health and diagnostics

Four other people already know.

She is reading her result for the first time. It reached four other organisations before it reached her, and her clinic's privacy notice names two of them.

One test result · five destinations

Every lit door is somebody who read it first

Asiri reads the destinations rather than asking you to recall them — and refuses to publish a notice its own register disproves.

  • In the notice

    The reference laboratory

    Agreement in force, destruction certificates arriving on schedule.

    Processor

  • In the notice

    The referring clinic

    A separate controller rather than a processor, which changes the paperwork entirely.

    Controller

  • Not in the notice

    The insurer

    Named nowhere. A reviewer finds this in one reading, and it needs no expertise to check.

    Controller

  • Not in the notice

    The SMS gateway

    Carries the result summary in the message body, through servers outside Nigeria.

    Processor · abroad

  • Not in the notice

    The analytics warehouse

    Holds a copy nobody remembered when her last access request was answered in full.

    Internal

Three of five, unaccounted for

Who touches your data

Her record, field by field

Five of these eight cannot rely on a contract

Asiri classifies each field as it is read, rather than asking somebody to remember which are sensitive. The medication list is the one people miss — it discloses a condition, so it inherits the condition's protection.

  • Full name

    Ordinary personal data

    Contract is enough. Nothing here needs a consent record.

  • Phone number

    Ordinary personal data

    Needed to deliver the result, so contract covers it.

  • Diagnosis

    Special category

    Explicit consent, or a named legal permission. Nothing else will do.

  • Test results

    Special category

    Including the ones never released to the patient. Same basis, same rules.

  • Prescriptions

    Special category

    A medication list discloses a condition, so it inherits the condition’s protection.

  • Genetic markers

    Special category

    Consent must name the purpose specifically. A general research clause does not cover it.

  • Biometric login

    Special category

    Used to identify a person, which is what makes it special category rather than a convenience.

  • Appointment history

    Ordinary — conditionally

    Until the clinic name reveals the condition, and then it is not.

Three doors, and one of them is shut

Health data has no legitimate interest to fall back on

Every other industry can argue its way to a lawful basis. You cannot. Special category data needs explicit consent or a specific legal permission — and explicit means the record can name the exact wording she saw.

  • Open

    Explicit consent, versioned

    She agreed to v2 of the patient notice in March 2023, in the app, with the wording kept exactly as published. If v5 widens what you do with her results, her agreement does not stretch to cover it — and Asiri says how many people sit in that position.

  • Open

    A specific legal permission

    Public health reporting, or care in an emergency where consent cannot be obtained. Narrow, named, recorded against the activity — not a general licence to process because you happen to be a clinic.

  • Shut · unavailable

    Legitimate interest

    Not available for health data, full stop. It is the basis most companies lean on when consent is inconvenient, and reaching for it here means the processing has no lawful basis at all. That is the finding, not a technicality.

Awareness to notification

One night decides what the breach costs you

Health records raise severity on volume alone, which almost always means telling the patients as well as the Commission. The clock runs from the moment somebody was aware — not from the moment the incident was agreed to be one.

31h 08m elapsed of 72

  1. Mon 14:20

    The misfiled results are already visible

    Nobody has looked yet. The exposure has begun but the clock has not — awareness is what starts it.

  2. Tue 09:14

    A nurse notices results in the wrong patient record

    This is awareness. The 72 hours start here, whatever anybody decides afterwards.

  3. Tue 11:40

    The team debates whether it counts as a breach

    Two and a half hours spent deciding. The most expensive hours of any incident are these.

  4. Wed 08:05

    The Commission is notified, 23 hours in

    Inside 72, with the timestamp on the trail. Late notification is its own finding, separate from the breach.

  5. Wed 15:00

    The 412 patients are told

    In plain words, with what was exposed and what to do about it. This is the part that decides whether they stay.

Find out which fields are running without a basis

Connect one system. Asiri returns the special category fields, the consent record behind each one, and the exact wording each person saw.